Quick Check: Convert These Counts
A survey of 200 pet owners: 0 pets: 40, 1 pet: 90, 2 pets: 50, 3+: 20.
Convert each count to a relative-frequency probability.
Work them out before advancing.
We Have Probabilities: Now Validate and Graph
We turned counts into probabilities.
Do they hold together — and what shape do they make?
The Sum Should Be About One
- A valid distribution's probabilities total 1
- For our table:
- With other data, small rounding can make it 0.99 or 1.01
Predict: Is a 1.01 Sum an Error?
A survey's probabilities sum to 1.01.
- A. A mistake — redo the work
- B. Something else is going on
Pick A or B before advancing.
It's Rounding — Just Renormalize
The cause is rounding of each reported percent, not an error.
- If you need an exact sum, renormalize: divide each probability by the total
- Example: each value divided by 1.01
Graph It: A Mildly Right-Skewed Shape
Most probability at 1 and 2 sets, a thin tail toward more.
It's a Data Histogram, Rescaled
- The bars came from survey counts, just divided by the total
- The y-axis reads probability instead of count
- An empirical distribution is essentially a rescaled data histogram
Your Turn: Validate and Describe
Take your pet-survey probabilities (0.20, 0.45, 0.25, 0.10).
Confirm they sum to 1, then describe the shape.
Commit before advancing.
Two Empirical Traps to Avoid
Raw counts are not probabilities — divide by the total; a probability is between 0 and 1
A sum of 0.99 or 1.01 is rounding — not an error; renormalize if you need exactly 1
What You Built In This Lesson
✓ Empirical probability = count ÷ total (relative frequency)
✓ Validate to about 1; rounding is normal
✓ It graphs as a rescaled data histogram
Coming Up Next: Expected Value and Scaling
Next lesson: compute the average TV sets per household, handle the open-ended "4 or more," and scale up.
How many sets would you expect in 100 households?