Margin of Error Is About Two SDs
- Margin of error ≈ 2 standard deviations
- That band captures the middle 95% of estimates
The Shaded Middle-95% Band of Estimates
With center 0.65 and SD ≈ 0.06:
- Two SDs ≈ 0.12
- The band runs from 0.53 to 0.77
That shaded band is "± 0.12" in visual form — the plausible values for
The Proportion Interval: 0.65 ± 0.12
Interval estimate = point estimate ± margin of error
- Point estimate in the center, margin reaching both ways
This is exactly "52%, ± 3 points" — and you just computed it.
Interpret in Context: 53% to 77%
The interval
- "We estimate that between 53% and 77% of all students would re-enroll."
Not "65% will" — a range, with the true value plausibly inside. The sentence is the conclusion.
The Same Procedure on the Mean
Commute estimates: center 27 min, SD ≈ 1.5 min.
- Margin ≈ 2 × 1.5 = 3 minutes
- Interval:
minutes
"The true mean commute is between 24 and 30 minutes." Same recipe.
The Formula as a Check, Not the Method
There's a formula:
- It gives nearly the same 0.12 — a useful check
- But simulation is the named method; it shows why
Keep the formula as verification. Understanding beats plugging in.
Compute the Margin and Write the Interval
A poll of 400 adults:
- Margin of error? (≈ 2 SD)
- Write the interval
- State it in context
Do all three — margin, interval, sentence — before advancing.
Now Make It Tighter and Bounded
You can now report an interval. Two questions remain:
- How do we make it tighter? (more data — but how much?)
- What can the margin never fix?
The second answer is the warning the whole unit builds toward.
Comparing Two Sample Sizes Side by Side
- Quadrupling n (80 → 320) halved the margin
- Not the proportional shrink you'd expect
Quadruple n to Halve the Margin
The margin shrinks like
- To halve the margin → quadruple n
- Doubling n shrinks it only by about 1.4×
Precision gets expensive fast. Each extra digit costs far more data.
Precision Is Expensive to Buy
Halving the margin costs 4× the data — time and money.
- Why polls settle near n = 1,000, margin ≈ 3 points
- This is all about precision — how tight the interval is
But tight says nothing about whether the interval is even centered on truth.
The Bias Caution: A Shifted Distribution
- A biased sample centers the whole distribution on the wrong value
- Narrow spread → small margin → but it's in the wrong place
A Tight Margin Can Be Precisely Wrong
A biased sample → a tight margin and a wrong interval.
- It may never even contain the truth
- Tight-and-wrong is worse than wide-and-honest
Precision is not accuracy. The margin assumes random sampling.
Margin of Error Is Not Bias Protection
The margin is precision under random sampling — nothing more.
- It never protects against a bad sampling method
- Same lesson as "size doesn't fix bias," now in interval form
Ask "was the sample random?" first. Only then does the margin mean anything.
Predict the Shrink; Flag the Bias
- Margin is 4% at n = 100. What n gives a 2% margin?
- A 100,000-person self-selected poll reports a margin under 1%. Why misleading?
Do both — predict the shrink, then flag the bias — before advancing.
Four Errors About Margins of Error
"Error" → it's sampling variability, not mistakes
"Bigger margin = worse data" → reflects n, not quality
"Double n halves it" → you must quadruple n
"It covers bias" → bias shifts the whole distribution; margin is blind
Four traps, four corrections.
Key Takeaways From Lesson Two
✓ Margin ≈ 2 SD → a range of plausible truths
✓ Interval = estimate ± margin; state it in context
✓ Margin shrinks like
The margin never fixes bias — it can be precisely wrong
Precision is not accuracy
Coming Up Next: Comparing Two Treatments
In the next lesson, the same tool tackles a difference between two groups.
When one treatment beats another by some gap — is it real, or just the bounce of random assignment?
Click to begin the narrated lesson
Estimate population parameters with margin of error