Units Multiply Through the Formula
Area is in square units because units multiply — not by convention.
Every Formula Has a Unit Contract
- Each variable has expected units
- Both sides must match in units
- Wrong input units → wrong output unit, even if the number looks reasonable
Rule: Identify expected units → convert → compute → verify output unit
Convert All Inputs Before Applying Any Formula
Problem:
Tracing Units Through
Correct:
Wrong:
Minutes break the unit contract — the answer unit is nonsense.
Spot the Mismatch: Simple Interest Formula
Simple interest:
dollars per year months
Before computing: what unit mismatch do you see?
Name the conversion needed before substituting.
Simple Interest: Wrong Setup vs. Right
Wrong:
Unit:
Correct: Convert
Unit:
The Three-Step Rule for Formulas
Before using any formula with given values:
- Identify the expected units for each variable
- Convert all inputs to those expected units
- Compute and verify the output unit matches the desired answer
Never skip step 1 — it's what makes step 2 possible.
Your Turn: Volume Formula Unit Audit
- Flag the unit mismatch
- Convert all inputs to meters
- Compute the correct volume with units
Show each step before computing.
Same Data, Two Different Visual Stories
What Every Graph Axis Must Show
Every axis needs:
- Quantity name — what is being measured
- Unit — in what
- Evenly spaced tick marks at consistent intervals
✓ "Time (hours)" — not just "t"
✓ "Height (meters)" — not just "h"
✗ "Test score" — missing unit and scale context
Probe: Is This Graph Lying?
A bar chart shows four companies' annual revenues.
The y-axis reads: 0 ... 5,000 ... 5,100 ... 5,200 (millions)
The bars look dramatically different in height.
Actual differences: between 2% and 4%.
Is this graph lying? What makes it misleading?
Scale Choice Depends on the Question
| Purpose | Best scale |
|---|---|
| "Is the student passing?" | y: 0–100 |
| "Is the student improving?" | y: 70–90 |
No single right scale — match it to the question.
Worked Example: Plant Growth Graph Scale
Heights (cm): 2, 6, 11, 17, 21, 28 over 6 weeks
- x-axis: "Time (weeks)", 0–6, intervals of 1
- y-axis: "Height (cm)", 0–30, intervals of 5
Why 0–30, not 0–100? Data reaches 28 cm — a wider range compresses the trend into a nearly flat line.
Critique This Graph: Find Two Problems
A graph with these features:
- y-axis: 3,500 to 4,200, no label
- x-axis: "Year"
- The line looks nearly vertical
- What is missing from the y-axis?
- What makes this scale misleading?
Choose the Right Graph for the Purpose
Revenue grew from $980k to $1,020k over three years.
Graph A: y: 0–1,500,000 → nearly flat line
Graph B: y: 970,000–1,030,000 → steep upward trend
Which graph fits each purpose?
- Investor comparing this company to competitors
- Internal progress review
Three Unit-Reasoning Traps in Practice
Formula trap: Substituting wrong units silently
Graph trap 1: Missing axis labels → "Height" tells you nothing without a unit
Graph trap 2: Steep visual line ≠ large absolute change — check the scale numbers
Key Ideas: Formulas and Graphs
✓ Check expected units before substituting into any formula
✓ Convert all inputs to matching units first
✓ Graph scale is a choice — match it to the question
✓ Label every axis: quantity name and unit
Steep visual slope ≠ large absolute change
What Comes Next: Choosing Quantities to Measure
You can now check units in computations, formulas, and graphs.
The next lesson adds a harder question: how do you choose what to measure?
Modeling from scratch requires these skills — plus judgment about what quantity matters most.
Click to begin the narrated lesson
Use units to solve problems