Runner Graph: Two Secant Lines
Two intervals reveal different average speeds.
Reading the Runner: Interval [0, 4]
From the graph:
The secant has slope 150 — the first four minutes were fast.
Reading the Runner: Interval [4, 8]
From the graph:
The secant has slope 62.5 — the second interval was slower.
Estimation Is Expected — Use Approximately
When reading from a graph:
- Exact coordinates are rarely readable
- Different students may read slightly different values
- Both answers can be correct if the reading is reasonable
Use the ≈ symbol. Write: "approximately 62 m/min."
The process matters more than the exact number.
Negative Rate Means the Function Decreases
Stock price declines from
Negative sign → price is falling.
Reading: 120 dollars at
Check: Which Interval Is Steeper?
Looking at the runner graph (Slide 4), compare the two secant lines.
- Which interval had the greater magnitude of AROC?
- What does the steeper secant mean physically?
Answer before the next slide.
Answer: First Interval Is Faster
- Interval [0, 4]: AROC = 150 m/min — steeper secant
- Interval [4, 8]: AROC = 62.5 m/min — less steep secant
Greater magnitude → faster average pace → steeper secant
Visual check: steeper secant always means greater magnitude.
Turning a Rate into a Meaningful Statement
A rate without context is incomplete.
Full interpretation requires three parts:
- Number — the computed value
- Units — output units per input unit
- Meaning — what it says about the situation
Example: "The sunflower grew at 5.5 inches per week on average during weeks 2–6."
Population Table: Comparing All Five Rates
Are the rates constant or varying?
Varying rates → growth is non-linear and accelerating.
Testing for Linearity with Equal Intervals
If you compute AROC over consecutive equal-width intervals:
- Rates all the same → function is linear
- Rates vary → function is non-linear
For the population table: 1.2, 1.4, 1.8, 2.1, 2.6 thousand/year
Rates increase → non-linear, accelerating growth.
Overall Rate Can Hide Important Trends
Overall rate (weeks 0–10):
This single number hides the acceleration.
Interval rates reveal the true trend: 1.2, 1.4, 1.8, 2.1, 2.6
Units: The Key to Interpretation
For every additional mile per hour of speed, fuel efficiency increases 0.25 mpg.
The units output per input give the interpretation.
Check: Is the Population Linear?
From the table, the five 2-year rates are: 1.2, 1.4, 1.8, 2.1, 2.6 thousand/year.
- Are these rates constant or changing?
- Is the population function linear or non-linear?
- What trend do the rates describe?
Write your three answers before the next slide.
Answer: Population Growth Is Non-Linear
- Rates are increasing — not constant
- Non-linear — rate of change varies with time
- Trend: growth is accelerating — each 2-year period adds more people than the last
Overall: 1.82 thousand/year — but the per-interval picture is richer.
Key Takeaways from Deck Two
✓ Estimate from graphs: read coordinates, compute secant slope
✓ Approximations are expected — use ≈
✓ Interpret with: number + units + meaning
✓ Constant rates over equal intervals = linear function
Rate ≠ function value — "per" in units signals a rate
What Comes Next: Graphing Functions
HSF.IF.C.7 — Graphing Functions
- Graphing linear and quadratic functions with key features
- Understanding domain connects to graph extent
- AROC connects to slope of secant and tangent lines
Average rate of change is a foundational tool for all function analysis.